Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
Answer:
people agreed to form government and limit that government with a contract
Explanation:
According to John locke, social contract is an agreement that the people in society made in order to maintain order/balance in society. The people agree to give up a certain level of their freedom and give the government with the power to regulate some aspects of their life. But in return, the government need to keep working to improve the quality of life of the people.
The implementation of John Locke's social contract can be seen in modern day democracy, where we let a limited form of government to regulate the citizens' life.
The word 'limited' means that we install barriers of protection to prevent the government from violating crucial human rights that the citizens possess. In United States for example, we can see this in the implementation of BILL of rights.
Probably B or C because if your inspecting the property you need to know what's wrong with it, maybe D too
I want to say A . Hope this helps :)
