1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alekssr [168]
3 years ago
5

Como surge la independencia de estados unidos?

History
1 answer:
salantis [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation: La guerra de Independencia de los Estados Unidos fue un conflicto bélico que enfrentó a las Trece Colonias británicas originales en América del Norte contra el Reino de Gran Bretaña. Ocurrió entre 1775 y 1783, finalizando con la derrota británica en la batalla de Yorktown y la firma del Tratado de París.

You might be interested in
Why does historian Jonathan Zeitz call the 1920’s an ""Age of Convergence?""
Svetach [21]

Answer:

Many trends, some had been building for decades, converged  to make 1920 very distinct

Explanation:

In 1920s, on one hand there was lot of urbanism, prosperity and cultural advancemeny and on the other hand there was immense social unrest. Like there was rise of KU KLUX CLAN, navatism and religious fundamentalism. America converged on the point of tradition and innovation.

3 0
3 years ago
What nation was the first to recognize the republic of texas as an independent nation ​
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

That would be the US I think.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In total, states had full women’s suffrage before 1920.
Goryan [66]
For 50 years before<span> the adoption of the 19th Amendment, women in one </span>state<span> ... on August 26, </span>1920<span>, women already </span>had full<span> voting rights in 15 </span>states<span>, most of ... </span>state<span> in particular that adopted </span>women's suffrage<span> a half-century </span>before<span> the ... a bill granting </span>all<span> female residents 21 years and older the right to vote.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
One major difference between McPherson's and Horwitz's historical interpretation of the Civil War.
TiliK225 [7]
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
4 0
3 years ago
SEE MULTIPLE CHOICE BELOW! I WILL GIVE POINTS<br>How did Washington's black basalt cliffs form?
Ilya [14]
As a result of lava that has cooled
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did expansion make civil wars larger and more harmful?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the islands of the caribbean form from?
    9·1 answer
  • The aim of the study of macroeconomics is to examine the interactions between individual producers and consumers. the behavior o
    7·1 answer
  • Rome was located 15 miles up the Tiber River in order to protect the city from raid by militia. true or false
    12·2 answers
  • during the antebellum period, colonization emerged as a solution for dealing with the population of freedmen
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the United States become involved in World War I? Question 1 options: The United States entered the war because of an un
    7·1 answer
  • Define McCarthyism and how it started?
    14·1 answer
  • What factors made it especially
    6·1 answer
  • Common feature of Muslim architecture
    10·2 answers
  • Was this an accurate assessment to test for bias?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!