can you post the document? otherwise i would love to help you :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to mention or attach the lenses that you refer to in the question. However, we can answer is general terms.
When we talk about the term "lens" in research, we are referring to a specific perspective to examine the topic at hand or the study. We can use philosophical lenses, economic, organizational, social, or psychological theories.
So we do not what lens you chose, but whatever your choice was, this lens might change how you approach researching your topic, thus affecting the historical narrative, because that particular approach is going to offer you different sources, authors, perspectives, and research lines to be followed. Your historic narrative would suffer modifications because you will have so many approaches to include in your research.
More than anything, the Spanish were seeking wealth.
Christopher Columbus himself thought that he had reached India: he wanted the wealth from the trade with Indians.
In the beginning, the Spanish hoped for Gold and Silver, later also for other products that could be made cheaper in the New World.
In short: the Spanish were not interested in Mexico but in what the ships could bring from Mexico (again, mostly gold).
Some, very few Spaniards, who settled in the New World were too unhappy in Europe and hoped for a better life.
The president nominates Supreme Court justices, but the <u>Senate </u>body must approve them.
<h3> Why does this often cause such a dramatic fight?</h3>
This cause such a dramatic fight because the person that was selected by the president may not be liked by some or majority of the senate. Some may like and some may not and this leads to disagreement.
<h3>Which body must approve the nomination for justices?</h3>
The president is known to be the person that has the power to nominate the justices and in terms of their appointments. they are known to be made with the advice and consent of the house of Senate.
Therefore, Since, The president nominates Supreme Court justices, but the <u>Senate </u>body must approve them. This cause such a dramatic fight because the person that was selected by the president may not be liked by some or majority of the senate. Some may like and some may not and this leads to disagreement.
Learn more about Supreme Court justices from
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
