France and Britain responded to the Emancipation Proclamation by refusing to recognize the Confederacy. declaring their support for slavery in the South. forming a trade alliance with the Confederacy. sending ambassadors to settle the Civil War.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Answer:
the renaissance
Explanation:
the answer is the renaissance
Answer:
You have to meditate in the Islamic way.
Explanation:
Well, this language is Malay and translated into English it states the following.
How do you emulate the nature of the Prophet's wisdom during the opening of the city of Mecca?
This includes Muhammad
