Answer:
A. Multifactor productivity
Original Value of output 2500 un. x $200/un. = $500,000 Value of input 2500 un x $120/un. = $300,000 Multi-factor productivity $500,000/$300,000 = 1.67 Overtime Value of output 4000 un. x $200/un. = $800,000 Value of input 4000 un. x $144/un. = $576,000 Multi-factor productivity $800,000/$576,000 = 1.39 Multi-factor productivity (1.67 – 1.39) / 1.67 = 16.8% decrease
B. LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
Original Value of output 2500 un. x $200/un. = $500,000 Input = (100 people x 40 hr/person) = 4000 hours Labor productivity $500,000/4000 hr = $125/hr Overtime Value of output 4000 un. x $200/un. = $800,000 Input = (100 people x 72 hr/person) = 7200 hours Labor productivity $800,000/7200 hr = $111/hr Labor productivity ($125/hr – $111/hr) / $125/hr = 11.1% decrease
C.GROSS PROFITS
Original $500,000 - $300,000 = $200,000 Overtime $800,000 - $576,000 = $224,000
$24,000 increase
Answer:
125 pounds
Explanation:
Firstly, we need to know the total product of labor of the five full time workers.
This is equal to 120 * 5 = 600 pounds
The last worker is 150 pounds
The total now is 600 + 150 = 750 pounds
The average product of the six workers will now be 750/6 = 125 pounds
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Issued common stock to investors in exchange for cash received from inventors - Increase in assets (cash) and an increase in equity (Capital)
2. Paid monthly rent - The decrease in equity and decrease in assets (cash)
3. Received cash from customers when service was rendered - Increase in assets (cash) and an increase in equity
4. Billed customers for services performed - Increase in assets (Accounts Receivable) and an increase in equity
5. Paid dividend to stockholders - The decrease in equity and decrease in assets (cash)
6.Incurred advertising expense on account - Decrease in equity and an increase in liability (Accounts Payable)
7.Received cash from customers billed in - Increase in the asset (cash) and decrease in the asset (Accounts Receivable)
8.Purchased additional equipment for cash - Increase in the asset (Equipment) and decrease in an asset (cash)
9.Purchased equipment on account - Increase in the asset (equipment) and an increase in liabilities (Accounts payable)
Many companies moved their operations from new england and the midwest to locations in the south because: the South had less expensive site factors than northern regions.
<h3>Change of operation location from midwest to south</h3>
The major reason why most companies tend to moved their operation to south was to maximize profit.
Compare to midwest, the site factors such as rew material, labor and land were more cheaper in the south.
This companies change their operation location because they want to reduce cost as their aims and objective is to generate or maximize profit.
Inconclusion the South had less expensive site factors than northern regions.
Learn more about Change of operation location from midwest to south here:brainly.com/question/503796
Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
