<em>Modernity has changed the role of the child in the family structure.</em>
In earlier days, a child was an investment for the family. Children were there to take care of their parents in their old age. Boys were supposed to fight and bring money home, girls were expected to help in the household and to marry well later in life. The family structure depended on them for survival and that's why families used to have many children, There was also a strong sense of honoring and obedience towards one's parents. They were seen an the absolute authority and disobedience was frown upon and even punished.
Nowadays, our culture has removed the most functional demands kids have to the family. The children are still seen as an investment but in a way that elevates the parents' prestige and not in the materialistic sense. Parents provide education for their kids so that the kids can get a good job, take care of themselves and live independently as adults. In many families, parents do not expect their children to look after them in old age. Children today have far more rights and fewer obligations as before, as their upbringing is centered on providing for their needs first. Therefore, many children today feel entitled to play a leading role in the family, demanding full attention of their parents. Disobedience is often not punished and misbehavior tolerated.
Answer:
Lies are obstacles that harm one's internal states of life which makes one unable to communicate with everyone. Topic Sentence: Although lies are used to avoid hurting one's relationship, they destroy the trust between people.
Answer:
Explanation:
it would motivate me to keep pushing and do the best at my ability and keep the positive and let go of the negative you have to always courage yourself to do better every day like pros and cons
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
1. an interview with a social media blogger
5. a piece by a family counselor in a newspaper
6. a journal article by a psychologist
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
A social media blogger would be an appropriate source because its credibility. A social media blogger likely has a lot of experience with social media, and therefore likely has knowledge of its psychological effects.
A family counselor is appropriate because your research question involves personal relationships. A family counselor is someone who knows a lot about personal relationships, and the psychology behind them.
A journal article by a psychologist is an appropriate source because a psychologist likely has knowledge about the psychological effects of a persons social life. Social media often plays a role in a person's social life.
Here's a photo of Edge, I wish you luck.
“in overcoming”
He repeats this to get his point across.
