Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process because of overconfidence and unrealistic expectation.
<h3>
Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process?</h3>
Olivera's strategy for managing the turnaround process wasn't very successful. Considering his prior success as an MT, he was overconfident. He had brilliant ideas and was skilled at analyzing the issues that the organization was experiencing inside.
However, he attempted to force such concepts on the four supervisors without first seeking his approval. When he proposed new plans or a change to the way they were functioning, the supervisors resisted because they had considerably more work experience than he did. It is normal to feel in charge when someone new appears out of nowhere and criticizes how things are being done. As a result, the supervisors disapproved of this change strategy.
<h3>
what would you have done differently?</h3>
An organization's goal is frequently to improve when it decides to launch a transformation program. I would have taken a variety of other actions if I were him. I would get to know the staff members better and develop a close personal bond with them during the first few months. Planning a lunch, a supper, or an expedition will help the team bond better. After that, I would visit with each department to discuss any problems they may be having or problems they think are hurting the company's sales.
After that, I would assess whether my observations matched up with the actual issues that employees believed the company was experiencing. Instead of making all the decisions at once, I would solicit the supervisors' opinions on the issues or areas they believe may be improved before providing my own perspective. In order to bring about change, I would advise the supervisor to explore each potential option one at a time without rushing.
Learn more about transformation program: brainly.com/question/10411144
#SPJ4
It compares production numbers of one product to another.... hope this helps
Neoconservatism is an isolationist foreign policy approach of a nation keeping to itself and only becoming involved after another nation requests it. False.
<h3>Neoconservatism: what is it?</h3>
Neoconservatism is a term used to describe views on foreign affairs that are pro-American nationalism. This includes increased military spending, support for democracy, nationalism, and anti-communism. In the 1960s, it first appeared in the US.
<h3>What distinguishes neoconservatism from paleoconservatism?</h3>
In contrast to neoconservatism, paleoconservatism supports republicanism and opposes free trade. Neoconservatives are viewed as imperialists by paleoconservatives, who identify as republican defenders. The majority of paleoconservatives are against LGBTQ rights, gay marriage, and abortion.
<h3>Who is the author of the phrase libertarian?</h3>
The French cognate libertaire, which was first used in a letter by French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque to mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1857, is where the term "libertarian" first appeared.
Learn more about Neoconservatism here:
brainly.com/question/28166778
#SPJ4
The answer is "variable-ratio schedule".
In operant conditioning, a variable-ratio plan refers to a calendar of fortification where a reaction is strengthened after an eccentric number of reactions. This timetable makes an enduring, high rate of reacting. Betting and lottery diversions are great cases of a reward in view of a variable ratio schedule.
