Answer:c. transparency
Explanation:
Transparency means working in a way that opens up to people so that they can be well aware of what is happening and how is happening. This means media makes policy and law making process more open , communicative and accountable to the public.
This allows the public to be included and be aware of the policy and law making process.
This means citizen are somehow active participants in the process because they can get an opportunity to share their own opinions regarding the process.
Answer:
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8–1) that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held, violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion.” (The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)
Explanation:
School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, ruled (8–1) <em>that legally or officially mandated Bible reading or prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. </em>Whether required by state laws or by rules adopted by local school boards, such practices, the court held that to violate the establishment clause of the <em>First Amendment,</em> which prohibits Congress from making any law <em>“respecting an establishment of religion.” </em>(The various provisions of the First Amendment, including the establishment clause, were gradually incorporated, or made binding on the states, by the Supreme Court in the first half of the 20th century through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.)
I can think of one advantage: if this party wins, it will have a majority in the parliament and senate, so it will be have more power and would not have to negotiate every voting with the other party in the coalition.
In a multiple party when coalitions , the smaller party in the coalition usually gets proportionately much more power because it can "blackmail" the bigger partner; this often stalls the voting process.
Answer:
(d) All of the above.
Explanation:
The prospect and issues regarding the framing of the Indian Constitution were one of the results of a united notion of an independent nation. Compared to that of Africa and its struggle with the Apartheid, India need not look for consensus opinion among the people. This was because the Indians, under British rule and already feeling frustrated with it, were already united and had already developed a consensus during the struggle for freedom.
So, the movement for that national unity and independence is not only a struggle against any foreign rule. It is also a <em>"struggle to rejuvenate our country as well as transform our society"</em>.
Thus, the correct answer is option d.
