1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anygoal [31]
4 years ago
8

Which statement is true about relations between Columbus and the Native Americans?

History
1 answer:
Zinaida [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct option is A. Good relations turned bad when Columbus realized the Native Americans had little to offer him.

Explanation:

The relations between Columbus and Native Americans seized when Columbus realized that they were of no benefit to him. Initially, Columbus had misunderstood the Native Americans to be Indians.  Along with his crew, Columbus at first treated the Americans as slaves considering them to be a part of East Indies.

Columbus wanted the natives to honor him with goods like gold and cotton. He and his crew abused them when they failed to do so.

You might be interested in
Item 5
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

a detailed biography

Explanation:

i took the test here is a screenshot

6 0
4 years ago
What were two major conflicts between the East and the West in the late 1940s and early 1950s?
marin [14]
Two major conflicts between the East and the West in the late 1940s and early 1950 were: struggle between democracy and communism and lifestyles. The west wanted democracy and the east wanted communism. The Soviets went so far as to set up a blockade, which was supposed to help with the spread of democracy. Lifestyles were in jeopardy as the West wanted more freedom and of course the East opposed. 
3 0
4 years ago
Which legislation did Theodore Roosevelt sign as president regarding his philosophy of conservation?
Oxana [17]

Answer:

The correct answer would be the creation of new national parks

Explanation:

This is because Teddy was strongly influenced on the preservation of land and resources

6 0
3 years ago
.Sometimes it is necessary to kill another human ?
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I have respect for well-meaning people who say, “it’s never right to kill.” The pacifist is a person of great bravery—but also naivety. Maybe they have had the good fortune of never experiencing anything that has forced them to question their belief. Clearly, they have never faced a force-on-force encounter, otherwise their moral stance would have resulted in them being dead.

Killing for domination, and ultimately for survival, is partly the reason why we are so successful as a species. Killing each other is part of the human experience and history has shown that mankind has always had a fascination with it.

Roman gladiatorial combat was barbaric, but it fulfilled a societal need. That need is still with us. According to US research, the average 18-year-old teenage boy has been subjected to approximately 22,000 killings of their fellow human beings on film, television and computer games. Death and combat have long been viewed as a form of entertainment. But killing is not just about people destroying each other. It can solve problems.

Would the Haitian slave rebellion of 1781 have been successful if the slaves had decided to join together as a union to demand freedom? Would their peaceful threats to withdraw their labour from the sugar cane fields unless their French owners gave in to their demands have been successful? I think not. The rebellion would have failed and even more slaves would have been killed. It would have been the only way the French could have solved the problem. We celebrate the slaves’ success now with the benefit of hindsight and regard the event as the start of abolition. Much like the fight against Hitler and fascism, the only way to win is to match the force and violence we face.

As the quote often attributed to Winston Churchill says: “You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth.”

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When was the first phone made
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

1876

Explanation:

While Italian innovator Antonio Meucci (pictured at left) is credited with inventing the first basic phone in 1849, and Frenchman Charles Bourseul devised a phone in 1854, Alexander Graham Bell won the first U.S. patent for the device in 1876

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are five germanic tribes
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Tang restore China’s strength?
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how the Archduke's death specifically led to WWI.
    6·1 answer
  • Who won world war 2?
    10·2 answers
  • Which item is an example of a secondary source?
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THE EXAM IS TOMORROW!!!
    5·2 answers
  • On the basis of this excerpt, what is of central importance for a monk?
    10·1 answer
  • What consequences did the proclamation of 1763 have on the colonist setting further west
    7·1 answer
  • What empire fell during the 5th century and was replaced by the middle ages
    12·1 answer
  • What did Palestine contain in which was valued by both Jewish and Arab people?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!