Answer:
The Supreme Court interprets due process as requiring state governments to provide some Bill of Rights protections,
Explanation:
Not much info in your question but this might be an option.
With the above article, you should take into consideration the bias. The correct answer is D.
A long time ago like big reptiles
Answer:
The national origins quota system ended.
Explanation:
Migration refers to the movement of a group of people from one geographical region (location) to another geographical destination in search of better living conditions, work or social amenities.
Population change equation states that the change in the size of a population over a specific period of time is equal to the sum of the number of births and the number of immigrants that joined.
Mathematically, the population change equation is given by the formula;
Population Change = (Natality - Mortality) + (Immigration - Emigration)
The Immigration Act and Naturalization of 1965 is also referred to as the Hart-Celler Act and it was enacted by the IS Congress to abolish the previous quota system based on national origins in the United States of America.
Hence, an effect of the Immigration Act of 1965 was that it ended the national origins quota system.
New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected
Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied
