Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
Answer:
This is an example of the encoding specificity principle.
Explanation:
According to the encoding specificity principle, memories are connected to the context in which they were created. As a matter of fact, retrieving a memory will be more easily done if the context and the cues of the current moment somehow duplicate the conditions present when the memory was formed. That is why Sharon cannot remember who the veterinarian is. They are not in his office, he is not wearing the usual attire, and so on. The context and the cues do not resemble the usual ones.
The most basic difference<span> lies in their view of human nature. For </span>Hobbes<span>, humans are eager of power and under the state of nature we tend to kill each other. ... For </span>Locke<span>, the state of nature is not as pessimistic as </span>Hobbes<span>. We can colaborate, but the problem is in property.</span>
B. the rules must be met in any area and you can not reward what is not done well
