Answer and explanation:
V originally equals u + at, but when you plug in u, a, and t you get a number answer.
u = 2
a = 15
t = 1/5
Rewrite the expression with the numbers plugged in.
V = (2) + (15)(1/5) <em>Multiply 15 by 1/5</em>
V = 2 + 3 <em>Add 2 and 3 together</em>
V = 5
<h2><u>So V would equal 5</u></h2>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Question 1: C
1 multiplied by 5 = 5
1 plus 5 = 6
So you get: (x+5)(x+1) which means x = -5 or -1
Question 2: B
2 multiplied by -4 = - 8
2 plus -4 = -2
So you get: (x-4)(x+2) which means x = 4 or -2
We can use the simple rule for finding the number of sales;
Sales = number of items sold ÷ (remaining item + items sold)
Therefore,
To find out the impact of the new label on sales we can say:
Sales = number of items sold ÷ (remaining item + items sold)
Sales for new label = p ÷ (p + q)
And,
Sales for old label = r ÷ (r + s)
Answer:
Y-int: (0,3)
X-int: (4,0)
Equation: y = -3/4x + 3
Step-by-step explanation:
now, le'ts do the summation using 0.5n+2
(0.5(2.7) + 2)+(0.5(3.0) + 2)+(0.5(3.2) + 2)+(0.5(3.7) + 2)+(0.5(4.4) + 2)+(0.5(4.9) + 2)+(0.5(5.3) + 2)
which gives us 27.6. Now, the paper doesn't state, or at least I don't see it, but that's just the sum of the hours, to get the average we simply divide that by 7, the amount of items, and 27.6 ÷ 7 gives us about 3.94.
does it underestimate or overestimate the one found with the summation? well, the summation gave us 3.9 and 3.94 is just 0.04 or 4 hundredths above it.