Answer:
Malcolm is showing evidence of gambler's fallacy.
This is the tendency to think previous results can affect future performance of an event that is fundamentally random.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since each round of the roulette-style game is independent of each other. The probability that 8 will come up at any time remains the same, equal to the probability of each number from 1 to 10 coming up. That it has not come up in the last 15 minutes does not increase or decrease the probability that it would come up afterwards.
Well if rounding it to the tenths is 230 then you would round back down to 200
Answer:
no values of x make the equation true
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that her work is correct, then the final step gives
4 = 5 ← meaningless
This indicates that the equation has no solution
Answer:
C)
region C
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to use what is called the zero-interval test [test point] in order to figure out which portion of the graph these inequalities share:

0 ≤ 2 ☑ [We shade the portion of the graph that CONTAIN THE ORIGIN, which is the bottom portion.]

0 ≥ −3 ☑ [We shade the portion of the graph that CONTAINS THE ORIGIN, which is the left side.]
So, now that we got that all cleared up, we can tell that both graphs share a region where the ORIGIN IS VISIBLE. Therefore region C matches the above inequalities.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.