The prejudice against the Jews was, they were killed by the Nazi policemen.
Explanation:
Anti-Semitism is prejudice or hostility against the Jews. The Holocaust was one of the most extreme examples of Anti-Semitism in history. Jews were not only treated badly during the time after World War I. Prejudice against Jews was still there in the ancient periods.
The Holocaust nearly killed 6 million Jews in the mass killing centers under the name of concentration camps by the Nazi polices. Also, the Jewish people's businesses looted and synagogues burned in the name of street violence.
Actually it was perfectly planned to target and attack the jews in the name of some random violence. Only the Jews arrested and sent to the Concentration camps from that violence to conduct Holocaust.
Answer:
Governments began eliminating strict regulations on businesses
and trade.- A.
Answer:
India's physical features include the Himalayan mountains, the Indo-Gangetic Plain and finally the plateau region. The country has a diverse climate, with the north being temperate and the south tending to be sub-tropical. The tall and rugged Himalayan mountains dominate the northern part of India
Explanation:
Answer:
An arms race denotes a rapid increase in the quantity or quality of instruments of military power by rival states in peacetime. The first modern arms race took place when France and Russia challenged the naval superiority of Britain in the late nineteenth century. Germany’s attempt to surpass Britain’s fleet spilled over into World War I, while tensions after the war between the United States, Britain and Japan resulted in the first major arms-limitation treaty at the Washington Conference. The buildup of arms was also a characteristic of the Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, though the development of nuclear weapons changed the stakes for the par
Over the past century, the arms race metaphor has assumed a prominent place in public discussion of military affairs. But even more than the other colorful metaphors of security studies–balance of power, escalation, and the like–it may cloud rather than clarify understanding of the dynamics of international rivalries.
An arms race denotes a rapid, competitive increase in the quantity or quality of instruments of military or naval power by rival states in peacetime. What it connotes is a game with a logic of its own. Typically, in popular depictions of arms races, the political calculations that start and regulate the pace of the game remain obscure. As Charles H. Fairbanks, Jr., has noted, “The strange result is that the activity of the other side, and not one’s own resources, plans, and motives, becomes the determinant of one’s behavior.” And what constitutes the “finish line” of the game is the province of assertion, rather than analysis. Many onlookers, and some participants, have claimed that the likelihood of war increases as the accumulation of arms proceeds apace.
Explanation:
