Yes he was. When Roosevelt met with Churchill in the middle of the Atlantic, he was showing his support for Britain and subsequently freedom in general. He made no formal declaration of hostilities.
The answer is (4) england :-)
The flaw was that the central government could not protect people and that they couldn't manage to make a good economic policy. This is why the heavy taxation of the agricultural workers led to mass resentment of all tax collectors. This was seen when the constitution was created later through acts that made only the central government capable of taxing and only if the house initiates it.
The Treaty of Versailles happened first.
This treaty officially ended World War I. In this treaty, Germany was forced to take full responsibility for the war and were forced to pay war reparations to countries like France. This economic punishment of Germany lead to a huge recession in the German economy. Ultimately, this failed economy allowed for the rise of Adolph Hitler. This is because German citizens were looking for an individual to make German prosperous and powerful.
All of the other events would are directly or indirectly a result of the Treaty of Versailles.
<span>Noam Chomsky is one of the most recognized names of our time; his contributions to linguistics and the implications of his theories for studies on the workings of the human mind have rocked the intellectual world for over fifty years, beginning with the critical reception of his first book on Syntactic Structures (1957), his </span><span>review of Skinner’s Verbal Behaviour for Language in 1959, and the range of books he produced in the 1960s, including his assessment of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory</span><span> in 1964,</span><span> Aspects of the Theory of Syntax<span> in 1965, Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar in 1966, Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, also in 1966, Language and Mind in 1968, and (with Morris Halle) The Sound Pattern of English (1968). Since then, the flow of linguistic work has been profuse, as Chomsky overturned</span></span><span>prevailing paradigms in fields concerned with the study of language and set the stage for the rethinking of the whole field of linguistics, often with overt reference to approaches first articulated during the Enlightenment. During this same period, Chomsky’s very public crusade against the Vietnam War, recorded in the pages of the New York Review of Books and assembled in </span>American Power and the New Mandarins,<span> his on-going critique of American foreign policy, his analyses of the Middle East and Central America, his long-standing local and international activism, and his studies (sometimes with Edward Herman) of how media functions in contemporary society, have combined to provoke some very strong feelings, positive and negative, about him and his work. The effect that he has upon people on account of his actions and his views extends across national, social, and institutional lines, and the ever-growing corpus of work he has undertaken in the political realm is a remarkable testament to what an intellectual can accomplish when engaged ‘beyond the ivory tower’.</span>
