This is a true statement.
The historical context of the times in which an event happened will help the historian to understand motives that may have influenced people's actions, as well as relationships between ideas and events occurring within a cultural time and space. Historical contexts of events in the past differ from conditions in our present context, so it is important to interpret according to context then rather than according to conditions now.
Claude Bélanger, professor of history at Marianopolis College in Canada, explains that historical context "is understood as the events, or the climate of opinion, that surround the issue at hand. They help to understand its urgency, its importance, its shape, or even its timing." Historical context includes social, political, economic, intellectual, cultural and religious trends that existed when and where the event you're studying occurred. The historian will want to assess things according to context that existed at that time, rather than judging the past according to context or standards that are in place in our own time, in order to be fair to the persons of that era.
<span>The correct answer is 2018. Senators have six-year terms and an unlimited number of possible terms, as long as the people support them. The senate and the house have unlimited number of terms possible unlike the president who can only be the president twice according to the constitution. Senator Tester will therefore be up for electio nagain in 2018 if the people choose to vote for him.</span>
George Washington was a military leader in both, the American revolution and the French and Indian War, thus being said he had military experience. He also was part of the constitutional convention which caused him to be liked by his peers.
He also shared the ideas to making the new country as different from its former ruler, England. Because of these 3 things, he was unanimously chosen to be the first president (despite him not wanting to be).
