Why is Attila the Hun a controversial historical figure?

History

2 answers:

bixtya [17]3 years ago

6 0

D Historians Believe that he is a myth rather than a Real historic

Keith_Richards [23]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

D. Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

Explanation:

Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.

Hope this helps ;)

You might be interested in

Which of the following statements is a valid economic conclusion based on this information?

BARSIC [14]

<span>it's the second one. it would be best for Sam to work only on making sales calls. </span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

These are goods provided by the federal, state and local governments for the public as group

erastova [34]

Answer:Public Goods

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

What kind of response did President Roosevelt receive when he suggested, in a 1937 speech in Chicago, that the United States gov

Sholpan [36]

Answer:

In 1937, President Roosevelt made a speech suggesting that United States government should be more assertive toward aggressor nations. His suggestion was greeted with massive protest from isolationists who charged Roosevelt with betraying "Americanism"

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Could slaves become citizens in Athens and Rome?

evablogger [386]

Answer:

Yes they could have became citizens of Rome and Athens because the law changed sooner than later.

Explanation:

That law was relaxed as well as time went on; for example, children of freed slaves could apply to become citizens. Even if both parents were Roman citizens, children had no rights. Boys of Roman citizens went though a ceremony when they were 16 or 17, depending upon how close their birthday was to March 17th, and at that time became citizens of Rome with full benefits.

6 0

2 years ago

Who was the French lord who led one of the First Crusades?

sladkih [1.3K]

Hello there, I am Steel42 and I am willing to help :)

The First crusades was led by many French Lords, but one that we are familiar with is, <span>Godfrey of Bouillon, a </span> Frankish knight, and one of the leaders of the First Crusade from 1096 until his death. They were also led by many dukes, some that is not named in history.

Hope this helps : )

6 0

2 years ago