1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
14

Which statement accurately compares the diction in Andrew Jackson’s on Indian removal

History
1 answer:
nika2105 [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.

Explanation

The difference between Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” is clearly writing techniques and the use of language. Jackson’s sentences are long and very often not really to the point, which makes him sound very intelligent and believable. On the other hand, Rutledge uses short and simple sentences that are straight to the point.

You might be interested in
How was the united kingdom's treatment of czechoslovakia different from its treatment of poland in the years before world war ii
Naddik [55]
The United Kingdom allowed Germany to take over part of Czechoslovakia, but it came to Poland's defense when Germany invaded.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Each state has an equal number of representatives in
Olegator [25]

Answer:

The Senate

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
in 1882, _____ left the texas state senate, a body which did not again have an african american member until 1966.
Dominik [7]

Answer:

legislators

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Please help I need an answer!!!
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

pursuing non violence would be a risk because it might not always work to solve issues and people might become violent to him and he'll get hurt

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Why is it so important that all citizens feel enfranchised in their own country
4vir4ik [10]

Answer: It embodies the concept of the Hallmark of Democracy

Explanation:

Enfranchisement refers to the right of citizens to vote for their own leaders and representatives. This is in line with the Hallmark of Democracy which means that citizens should be able to participate in the running of their own affairs by picking people who represent their interests.

All eligible citizens should have this right to enfranchisement because they have the right to have a say in how they should be governed as this goes in line with the concepts of freedom and liberty which every human should be entitled to.

If citizens do not feel as though they have this right, they will avoid taking part in government which would have the effect of the Government lacking the support of the people and for a Government to function, they need the people.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who is referred to as the Father of the Constitution? A. George Washington B. Thomas Jefferson C. James Madison D. Alexander Ham
    13·1 answer
  • Read this text from the Constitution:
    5·1 answer
  • Please in 4 sentences discuss what you learned about World War 1
    12·2 answers
  • What happened to Iceland 12,000 years ago
    10·1 answer
  • Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presi
    5·2 answers
  • Which invention helped fuel the Renaissance?
    8·2 answers
  • Why was South Carolina against the tariff abomination in 1828
    15·1 answer
  • What are some examples of the trigger in WWI? (except the assassination)
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a broken job-role stereotype?
    11·2 answers
  • **This is specifically World History**
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!