1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
8

Without generalizing, inductive reasoning is not possible. a. True b. False

English
2 answers:
notsponge [240]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

true.

Explanation:

Inductive reasoning, in broad and basic terms, is a form of reasoning that entails proposing and studying a given number of premises or particular cases in order to reach a probable conclusion. For this matter, certainly, generalizing is unavoidable in inductive reasoning since it is virtually impossible to analyze all possible instances of a probable conclusion.  

goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
3 0
<span>a. True......Its to much to explain why

</span>
You might be interested in
Identify which homophones are used correctly and which are used incorrectly by placing each example in the correct category.
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Correct Usage:

- Your order is ready

- They're always willing to help

- It's windy and cold today

Incorrect Usage:

- I didn't see you their

- Can I come, to?

- The dog wagged it's tail

4 0
3 years ago
In what ways does the author react differently to Anne Frank's diary when she reads it as an adult? Cite evidence from the text
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

The authors is very surprised

3 0
3 years ago
Which answer corrects the error in capitalization? Good news, dad, I am now the secretary of the club. A. Secretary B. News C. C
harkovskaia [24]
D. Dad
In this sentence, dad is being used as a name or proper noun.  It needs to be capitalized.
7 0
3 years ago
As it is used in paragraph 10, what is the most likely meaning of the word propensity?
Elenna [48]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

the word means a tendency to behave in a particular way

6 0
3 years ago
Reread paragraph 14 from Baker's speech. What can be inferred from this paragraph?
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

“SPEECH AT THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON”

C. Baker believes speaking out against injustice is effective.

Explanation:

In her 1963 “SPEECH AT THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON,” Josephine Baker said "They were mad because I told the truth."  But, speaking out against injustice is effective.  It yields the desired outcome if not in one's lifetime, in the lifetime of one's children and grandchildren.  Injustice should never be stomached by any human being.  According to Baker, you do not need gun to fight injustice, use pen instead.

Josephine Baker was an American-born French entertainer, who fled the US amidst unmitigated racial discrimination and segregation.  She went to Paris, France where she became an instant success, gaining an opportunity that was denied her in her native country.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Choose the sentence that does NOT demonstrate redundant language, repetitive synonyms, or inappropriate connotation. I'm not sur
    10·1 answer
  • What is a run on sentence?
    14·2 answers
  • In the following sentence a comma or commas should be inserted after which word or words? Mrs. Cortez our neighbor is from Mexic
    9·1 answer
  • Define mood and theme; explain how an authors choice of language impact stem in a literary work
    10·1 answer
  • Item 5
    14·2 answers
  • How did the achievement of women's suffrage change society's opinion of women?
    15·1 answer
  • Use R.A.C.E. to type a one paragraph, short-answer response to this prompt: How does the author use point of view to reveal what
    5·1 answer
  • Match each example of characterization with the correct type.
    8·1 answer
  • Review the underlined sentences on
    5·2 answers
  • Hello. Does anyone have any possible story ideas. I need to write a fictional short narrative. I need this done by tinight and I
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!