<u>Answer:</u>
Libertarianism and utilitarianism are in opposition to one another. In utilitarianism, individuals accept that an activity that produces satisfaction is the thing that one ought to go. Utilitarians could not care less whether what they are doing occupies someone else's privileges. While, in libertarianism, an individual's activity for bliss ought not to disregard someone else's rights. Libertarians’ esteem activities that advance reasonableness and equity in the general public dissimilar to the practical actions that now and again damages decency and fairness.
It should be.... the Napoleonic Wars.
Answer:
Definitions?
Rebublic-a form of government in which the people elect, or choose, their leaders. (Ex. Presidents.)
Monarchy-a form of government that has a single person known as a monarch at its head. (Ex. King,Queen)
Explanation:
I hope that helps :)
Islam was able to appeal to people of so many different cultures because it <span>was not pushed onto the people all at once and allowed their culture to remain.</span>
Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
