I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Taxing African Americans when they voted. (Poll Taxes)
<span>the best option is B
the development of more efficient agriculture
The emergence of efficient forms of agriculture especially in Mesopotamia, led to emergence of early city states as food was produced in surplus to feed the town population. it also led to division of labor. this form of agriculture also contributed to sedentary lifestyle and improved nutrition thus explosive population that contributed to city establishments.
</span>
It would be the Arabian penisula
The major city in the Central Plains of Wisconsin is <span>Wausau. (Unless you meant several cities?)</span>
