Answer:
$2.50
Explanation:
Calculation for the estimation of variable cost per unit
Units Total cost
High method 15,000×$5 per units =$75,000
(5,000*3)=15,000
Low method 5,000*$10 per units=$50,000
Difference 10,000 $25,000
Variable cost per unit =$25,000/10,000
Variable cost per unit=$2.50
Note: Based on the information given we were told that production tripled to its highest level which means the high method units will be 15,000 units (5,000 units*3)
Therefore Fremont would estimate its variable cost per unit as: $2.50
Answer:
(D) Both number of units produced and amount of direct materials used in production are correct.
Explanation:
Answer:
This is not necessarily evidence that the proportion of Americans who are afraid to fly has decreaseddecreased because belowbelow 0.10 because the proportion of sample, is nothing very close to 0.10.
Explanation:
n = 1100
p = 0.10
Using the formula np(1-p), we will have
= 1100(0.10)*(1 - 0.10)
= 1100*0.10*0.90
= 99
99 ≥ 10
This satisfies normal distribution condition. That is, proportion of sample are normally distributed.
Answer:If the firm had sharp seasonal sales patterns, or if it grew rapidly during the year, many ratios would most likely be distorted.
Explanation: Fluctuations in Economics patterns have distorting effects on the ratios of a company or an economy especially if the the seasonal patterns has been consistent for a certain period. THE VALIDITY OF MOST RATIOS ARE SEVERELY AFFECTED BY SHARP CHANGES WHICH MAKES ECONOMIC WATCHERS FEEL THE RATIOS ALREADY ANALYSED ARE NOT VALID.
A consistent flow pattern is desired in an economy and in business Organisation as it helps to give Economic watchers enough confidence in the ratios already existing.
