1- The correct answer is A. Samuel Houston was the Texan leader who most supported the annexation to the United States. In fact, he was President of the Republic of Texas twice, and from his position he always fought for annexation, unlike others like Mirabeau Lamar. In addition, it is stated that Houston went to Texas sent by President Andrew Jackson to achieve annexation.
2- Houston argued that the annexation had to be carried out to respect the will and right of the Texan people (which were made up of American settlers) to decide the legal status of their territory. This argument is related to the right of self-determination of peoples, which I consider valid since it's theb population who has the power to decide on their future and that of the territory they inhabit and administer, not being the states able to make decisions contrary to the people and their will.
Gave information about the Africa and Asia ..
Indians used violent as well as peaceful means of agitation against the British rulers. The Congress Party was the largest anti-British organization. Led by Gandhi ji, it used non-violence and satyagraha to press its demands for independence.
Not all the Indians believed in peaceful means, though. The Indian National Army was a military organization that actively fought against the British forces during the Second World War.
There were a lot of revolutionaries also who used bombs and weapons against the British. Some of them were grouped under the Hindustan Republican Army.
Impressment of US soldiers
For the answer to the question above asking w<span>hat argument was the author of this statement, john marshall, making about how the federal government should function?
The answer is </span>the judicial branch of the federal government should have power to interpret laws.
