The statement that the behavioral revolution in educational psychology occurred because the objectives spelled out in the cognitive approach to learning did not address many of the actual goals and needs of classroom educators is False
The scientific study of the mind and behaviour is called psychology. The study of conscious and unconscious events, such as emotions and thoughts, is included in psychology. It is a field of study that bridges the natural and social sciences and has a huge scope. Psychologists are interested in learning about the brain's emergent features, which connects psychology to neuroscience. Psychologists seek to comprehend both individual and community behaviour in their roles as social scientists. The Greek letter (or psi) is frequently used to refer to the field of psychology.
Learn more about Psychology here:
brainly.com/question/10980588
#SPJ4
Answer:
Sedimentary rock: they are soft and made up of layers called strata.
Metaphoric rocks: They are crystalline and crystals within it are arranged in bands.
Igneous rocks: They are made of crystals( the size of the crystals depend on how fast the rocks cool). They usually don't react with acids, and they can be fine-grained, or glassy( like Obsidian)
Explanation:
Answer:
boom
Explanation:
By having a strong rule of law, governments give business and society the stability of knowing that all rights are respected and protected. A strong rule of law includes: Clearly written and easily accessible laws that create certainty and enforceability of legal rights
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
