1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ElenaW [278]
2 years ago
8

Wayne worked in an office. He had no criminal record, had never had a complaint made against him about his work or his conduct,

and had been a faithful employee for nearly 20 years. One day, Wayne followed his supervisor to his home and fatally shot him. The estate of the supervisor sued the company, claiming it should have been aware of Wayne's growing frustration with work. The company's best defense will be that
a. there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
b. the incident occurred away from the office.
c. the killing was the result of a personal conflict between Wayne and the supervisor.
d. even if the company had been aware of Wayne's difficulty with his supervisor, Wayne did not have any criminal history.
Social Studies
1 answer:
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a).there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A psychologist specializing in marriage counseling claims that, among all married couples, the proportion for whom her communica
Sedbober [7]

At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.

Explanation:

When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.

Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.

5 0
3 years ago
according to the torah ,why did Egypt's pharaoh mistrust the Israelites and why did he free them from slavery to leave egypt
Irina18 [472]

First, the Torah or “the book of the Law of Moses” is a book that belongs to the religion of Judaism and forms all the basis for the rules and practices of the religion. In this book it is stated that the Israelites had a different believed, as they believed in monotheism, from the Egyptian pharaoh. Nevertheless, the pharaoh didn’t let them free, on the opposite, he became mistrustful of them, as their population increased, and made them work as slaves. Nevertheless, God send horrible suffering to every firstborn Egyptian son; plagues of insects, sickness and death. Finally, this led up to the pharaoh changing his mind, letting Moses guide the Israelites out of Egypt. Hope this helps!

6 0
2 years ago
Do you think that the assimilation policy adopted by the us government was a good idea
pashok25 [27]
No, because by taking children away from their families, it destroyed traditional cultures, and aboriginal society.
8 0
2 years ago
Delusions of ______ are the most common theme among schizophrenics
Travka [436]
Hey there,
The answer is persecution.

Hope this helps :))

~Top
3 0
3 years ago
According to your textbook, what kind of reasoning is used in the following statement?
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

The answer options are:

a.     positive reasoning

b.     analogical reasoning

c.     chronological reasoning

d.     functional reasoning

e.     dialogical reasoning

The correct answer is: B. Analogical reasoning.

Explanation:

Analogical reasoning can be understood as any type of thinking that involves the use of analogies.

An analogy is a comparison between two or more separate things that relate in some way for the purpose of explaining something.

In this particular case, the statement contains analogical reasoning when it says that "Five years ago, we came together as a community to build a new elementary school. Today we are asking you to come together again, this time to build a recreational facility.

Two separate situations are being compared.

In conclusion, the correct answer is b. analogical reasoning.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the first President of South America?
    14·2 answers
  • Which is not a successful strategy to deal with debt ?
    6·1 answer
  • How does south asia differ from the rest of the eastern hemisphere
    13·1 answer
  • What is a health insurance deductible?
    10·2 answers
  • An enumerated power is a power of Congress that is __________.
    12·2 answers
  • Much of the increased agricultural productivity in the Second Agricultural Revolution was due to mechanization, crop rotation, s
    7·1 answer
  • The legal authority of a salesperson normally is:
    14·1 answer
  • Tammy wanted to study only students who do very well in class because these students would best help her test her theory. She at
    8·1 answer
  • How did Congress protect the New England textile industry?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the goals of the colonists new spain
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!