1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elis [28]
3 years ago
12

When do I use uno una unos unas in spanish and when do i not?

Spanish
2 answers:
Vadim26 [7]3 years ago
4 0
One person male= Uno
One person female= una
Group of males= unos
Group of females= unas
but you also have to take in mind the amount of people and they’re gender. If there is 6 men the group is considered “unos” if there are 6 women they are considered “unas” but if on man comes into the group and now there are 5 women and one man they become “unos”
One man is all you need for the whole group of people to be considered male so that how you should address them
Example:
Tengo unas amigas= i have some friends (all females)
Tengo unos amigos= i have sample friends (all males) (same if they’re are any females involved as long as there is atletas y one male in the group your talking about)
Tengo un amigo= i have one friend (male)
Tengo una amiga= i have one friend (female)
Basile [38]3 years ago
3 0
When you're talking about nonspecific things.
it's like (a) and (an) in english.
uno is for singular masculine.
una is for singular feminine.
unos is for plural masculine.
unas is for plural feminine.
You might be interested in
Can someone check this to make sure that the verbs are AR verbs and in preterit tense.
valina [46]
I know for sure that its wrong, but sorry im not sure how to fix it.
5 0
3 years ago
Which tax correctly matches the description?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
The answer I think would be impuesto al valor agregado. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is punishmen a pathway to rehabilitation and reformation? Explain
Bond [772]

Probably the noblest and most humane purpose of punishment in the criminal law is rehabilitation. When a citizen's criminal tendencies are "cured" (in a manner of speaking) so that he or she never has the urge to commit crime again and, even further, becomes a productive member of society, then society is not only protected from future harm but it's also made richer by the successful re-entry of one of its members. It's a win-win situation in which both society and criminal offenders benefit.

Idealogically, rehabilitation is a very sound goal for punishment. It's pleasant and beautiful to imagine the successful general rehabilitation of society's criminals. If only adult criminals could be successfully rehabilitated, then the phenomenon of crime could be all but eliminated, and criminal offenses restricted from then on to juvenile delinquency and the occasional act of passion.

Ah, if only. While few seriously argue against the utility of reforming criminal offenders, there are powerful arguments against placing too much importance on rehabilitation, not the least of which is that it tends not to work. In 1994, over sixty percent of criminal offenders who were released from U.S. correctional facilities were arrested again within three years or less. Fifty percent went back into the system. High recidivism rates are a powerful argument against the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the criminal law. It is time-consuming and dubious effort to meaningfully reform serious criminals, and it costs more for tax-payers. However fine and noble the idea of reforming criminals into productive members of society may be, the statistics alone speak out strongly against the attempt.

On the other hand, it is probably a bit much to argue that criminal offenders are fundamentally unworthy of the efforts of rehabilitation, and that it's good for them to suffer for what they've done without any help or reprieve. Perhaps. In the real world, many criminals may be truly un-reformable, and any attempt to rehabiliate them would be a waste of effort and resources. Also, the pain of crime victims and their loved ones cannot be ignored or reasoned away, and to deny them some feeling of satisfied vengeance could be seen as an abject failure of the justice system. But, all things considered, it is at least feasable for a society that cherishes the precept "innocent until proven guilty" to some day place equal value on the precept "reformable until proven otherwise." Of course, the only way to prove this is to try.

4 0
3 years ago
The ones in red i need help but the ones in green i dont need help.
Harlamova29_29 [7]
1. es
2. están
3. es
4. son
5. es
6. somos
7. está
8. es
10. Es
11. eres
12. están
14. eres
15. estamos
16. están
3 0
3 years ago
Write the words that best completes the sentence.
marishachu [46]
Pretty sure it’s B, but it’s not C or D
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Here are some ideas to get you started:
    15·1 answer
  • 1. ¿Quién compra los pasajes de avión? (la Sra. Garza) 2. ¿Quién tiene que hacer las maletas de los niños? (María) 3. ¿Quiénes b
    7·1 answer
  • Poemas con sinaleticas
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!! CORRECT ANSWERS ONLY PLEASE!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Celia Cruz and and willy chirino have stars on the walkway of the stars located on which famous street
    11·1 answer
  • Essay about blankets
    12·1 answer
  • Señala los elementos q no pueden aparecer en un sintagma predicado nominal (SPN) - Complemento directo -copula complento indirec
    7·2 answers
  • Qué tres palabras describlen mejor a abril y por qué
    6·1 answer
  • Mis padres
    12·1 answer
  • Escoge.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!