1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kitty [74]
4 years ago
5

Mark's state legislature passed a law that requires restaurant employees to receive four hours of first aid training that must i

nclude instruction on the Heimlich maneuver. The law also requires that employees take reasonable efforts to provide assistance to any customers who experience a health emergency at a restaurant. Mark, a restaurant server, received the required training but did nothing to help a customer who choked on his food at Mark's restaurant. When Mark is charged with violating the statute, he argues that he did not believe that choking qualified as a health emergency. How will the court interpreting the meaning of "health emergency" in this statute?
Law
2 answers:
Kaylis [27]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

By using the plain meaning rule because "health emergency" has an ordinary meaning to the general population.

Explanation:

pshichka [43]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

By using the plain meaning rule.

Explanation:

The plain meaning rule dictates that statutes are to be interpreted using the ordinary meaning of the language of the statute.  The plain meaning rule is the mechanism that prevents courts from taking sides in legislative or political issues.

Choking is a blockage of the upper airway by food or other objects, which prevents a person from breathing effectively. Choking can cause a simple coughing fit, but complete blockage of the airway may lead to death. Choking is a true medical emergency that requires fast, appropriate action by anyone available

You might be interested in
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Explain how civic responsibility and performing civic duties can protect our democratic freedoms.
Goryan [66]
Your answer is they can protect democratic freedoms
8 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

It is B I just know lol.

4 0
3 years ago
Daniel has seized David’s briefcase full of cash and important documents illegally by threatening to shoot him. Which crime has
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Robbery

Explanation:

Robbery and larceny may seem similar but there's a difference between the two. The basic distinction between robbery and larceny crimes is that robbery involves the <em>use of force</em>, whereas larceny doesn’t. So, in the scenario provided, force was used in order to deprive someone of their property. Thus, the answer is B.) Robbery.

8 0
3 years ago
A well-documented rise in global temperatures has coincided with a significant increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide i
lianna [129]

Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA lacked the authority to regulate carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” emissions from new motor vehicles.

<h3>What is EPA's regulatory authority?</h3>

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the responsibility of:

  • Protecting people and the environment from significant health risks.
  • Sponsoring and conducting research for the development and enforcement of environmental regulations.

Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA was not explicitly authorized to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

Thus, since air pollutants, including greenhouse gas, cause air pollution, the EPA should not refuse to regulate carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” emissions from new motor vehicles.

Learn more about the EPA and the Clean Air Act at brainly.com/question/4253930

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the first United States President to declare war on drugs?​
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes what an associate’s degree is with respect to the criminal justice system? It is the first
    6·2 answers
  • Chose all of the following types of contracts that must be in writing and signed by the defendant to be enforceable: a. Sale of
    13·1 answer
  • Write about family a political socialization agent
    7·1 answer
  • What system of justice that we use today was based on a system used during the reign of Henry ll?
    12·1 answer
  • A vulnerability is a condition or weakness in (or the absence of) security procedures, technical controls, physical controls, or
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was signed by the colonists to separate themselves politically from Britain?
    9·2 answers
  • A spouse can be provided information such as hospital
    13·1 answer
  • Which systems are responsible for making decisions regarding fault and punishment?.
    9·1 answer
  • This question is mde for scottrn9696 76+98+100+08^78(0908409)---0983710 E=mc^2
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!