It could be both answers. It honestly depends for me, the school board could be the superintendents making decisions or it could include parents of the school.
Answer:
Our government places a high priority on the public being allowed to speak their minds about elected officials as well as other public figures. People in the public eye get less protection from defamatory statements and face a higher burden when attempting to win a defamation lawsuit.
When an official is criticized in a false and injurious way for something that relates to their behavior in office, the official must prove all of the above elements associated with normal defamation, and must also show that the statement was made with "actual malice."
"Actual malice" was defined in a U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1988, Hustler v. Falwell. In that case, the court held that certain statements that would otherwise be defamatory were protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
This meant that public officials could only win a defamation suit when the statement that was made wasn't an honest mistake and was in fact published with the actual intent to harm the public figure. Actual malice only occurs when the person making the statement knew the statement was not true at the time the statement was made or had a reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.
For other people that are in the public eye, such as celebrities, they too must prove that the defamatory statements were made with actual malice.
hope it helps
This case will need to be tried at least in a federal and a transnational or international court. Moreover, this will involve both national and international jurisdictions.
In law, there are three main types of courts:
- Constitutional courts.
- Federal courts.
- Transnational courts.
Each of these applies the jurisdiction of the same level. For example, a constitutional court will apply the constitutional laws and specific state laws.
In the case presented, two of these courts are required:
- Federal court: This is necessary because the crime was perpetrated in the U.S. territory, and therefore criminals are judged under U.S. Federal law.
- Transnational court: Considering the pirates might not be American, and therefore there are at least 2 countries involved, it is necessary to consider the case under international maritime laws.
Learn more about law in: brainly.com/question/6590381
Answer:
Explanation:
You must lay a foundation for an exhibit before the court will admit it. This requires a particular fact or event to occur before such an item is considered evidence. These facts and events help to show which information demonstrates that the particular exhibit is reliable and can be trusted.
