Answer:
thinfs have been done differently over the years
Explanation:
if you are comparing two separate things that look the same, they may look simlular but are different (sorry ifbthis is wrong. this is what I thought of and it may help spark an idea of your own)
To analyze the life of a particular individual among the options available in the question and how it reflected the social changes of the 1920s, let's choose Ernest Hemingway.
<h3>Who was Ernest Hemingway?
</h3>
He was an American writer born in 1899, most notably his work<em> "For Whom the Bell Tolls"</em> being a novel inspired by his experience as a correspondent in the Spanish Civil War of 1936.
The writer's life was impacted by the wars that took place in the world in that period, during the First World War, he went to Europe decided to go to war.
In the year 1921, he returns to Paris as a member of a community of expatriate writers, who were called the<em> "lost generation"</em>. Therefore, Hemingway's works reflected his experiences in the period of social changes in the world.
Find out more information about Ernest Hemingway here:
brainly.com/question/4956305
Answer:
In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.
Explanation:
i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it
Answer:
the rise of Napoleon
a strong leadership of Louis XVI
the First and Second Estates were very angry because of the high taxes they had to pay
Explanation:
