<span>c. actual usage of material exceeds the standard material allowed for output.</span>
Answer:
3,000 units and 1,950 units
Explanation:
For computing the equivalent units of ending work in process for materials and conversion cost, first we have to determine the ending work in process units which is shown below:
Ending work in process units = Beginning inventory + units started - units completed and transferred
= 2,500 units + 18,000 units - 17,500 units
= 3,000 units
Now the equivalent units of ending work in process for materials would be
= 3,000 units × 100%
= 3,000 units
And, for conversion cost it would be
= 3,000 units × 65%
= 1,950 units
Answer:
The multiple choices are:
$5,006.00
B $5,018.75
C $5,025.00
D $5,028.75
The correct option is B,$5018.75
Explanation:
The key to unlock this question is to know that government securities are usually quoted in 1/32 nds ,which means that in calculating the price the number after 100 is is multiplied by 1/32.
1M means 1000,while 5M means 5000
The price of 5M=5000*(100+12*1/32)%
The price of 5M=5000*(100+0.375
)%
The price of 5M=$5018.75
In this case the bid price which is lower is used when selling securities to the dealer
Answer:
Price elasticity of demand shows how much a 1% change in the price of a good or services changes the quantity demanded.
In the short run, a 10% increase in price decreases quantity demanded by 4%
PED short run = % change in price / % change in quantity = 4% / 10% = 0.4
PED long run = % change in price / % change in quantity = 7.5% / 10% = 0.75
Both PEDs are inelastic since they are less than 1, which means that an increase in price will result in a proportionally smaller decrease in the quantity demanded. But the PED in the long run is less inelastic, which means that an increase in price will decrease the quantity demanded more in the long than in the short run.
This happens because smokes consider that cigarettes are a basic necessity, so they are willing to purchase them even if the price increases. But as time passes (long run), more smokers will consider that it is not worth paying that much for cigarettes and will probably quit smoking or at least reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke per day.
Answer:
The answer is false
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, comparing the two firm and saying there will not reach into a conclusion to which firm is better manage is false, this is because the difference in debt is a result of better management, and this could be the cause of Firm A's higher profit margin. So the claim was false
