The thing that would interest him the most and is an advantage is that if one partner were to make a mistake, he would not be held accountable for it. Unlike the general partnership where everyone gets equal blame for the downfall of a company, in limited liability it is known what falls under whose jurisdiction and if someone causes the company to go bankrupt, the ones whose fault it's not can't get sued.
Answer:
Both will bear
Explanation:
Both Mr. Janey and Ms. lacey will bear the incidence of the property tax increase because Mr. Janey has only shifted $540 ( $45 x 12) of the total $1200 by increasing the monthly rent charge of his tenant Ms. lacey by $45/month. Mr. Janey will pay only $660 of $1200 increase in tax and remaining will be paid by Mr Lacey.
Answer:
Kurt will have a smaller account value than Jeff will
Explanation:
The formula for calculating future value = A (B / r)
B = [(1 + r)^n] - 1
Jeff : $3000 x [(1.05^3 - 1 ) / 0.05] = $9457.50
Kurt :$3000 x [(1.03^3 - 1 ) / 0.03] = $9272.70
Jeff would have a higher account value than Kurt
Answer:
If discontinued, then their operating income will decrease by 168,800
It is a better deal to continue the backpack division active.
Explanation:
sales 960,000
variable cost (475,000)
contribution 485,000
fixed cost (527,000)
loss (42,000)
if Dropped
40% of fixed cost are unavoidable
527,000 x 40% = (210,800)
Difference: 42,000-210,800 = (168,800)
