Answer:
inanity
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Cooper should have paid more attention to the inanity of the site. This term refers to nonsensical remarks or actions. This is because if he would have looked at the site more in depth, he would have seen lots of these nonsensical remarks and eventually realized it was a fiction-writing site before posting the article.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
The institutional resource in which <span> leaders both appointed by the president and approved by the Senate is: The Cabinet
The cabinet filled by the people that the president's trust themselves to handle specific aspects of their governmental plans. The senate, however, has the basis to accuse that a cabinet candidate is unsuited for the position and filibuster him/her.</span>
I would suggest that bill shows his son what happens if he does drugs (pictures, etc) and makes his curfew really early
The leaders of the dynasties are many, as dynasties last much longer than human life. It would mostly be the Chinese emperor of th time.
If you mean the founders: the founder of the Han was emperor Gao (previously rebel leader Liu Bang) and the founder of Qin was Duke Xiang, a leader of a war expedition.
