•Amendments Proposed by the Legislature.
•Constitution Revision Commission.
•Citizens' Initiative.
•Constitutional Convention.
•Taxation & Budget Reform Commission (TBRC)
•The Vote
First of do not click the link the other guy sent it’s a virus, but the answer is “They disliked it because there was another religion and culture, so people were doing things different because they have different cultures.” I hope this helps you!
I believe, both private sectors and the government sectors had duties in helping the poor, but in different ways.
Private sectors
-Private sectors could help the poor by providing job opportunities that produce salary for the poor.
- Not only that, private sectors should paid the required amount of taxes that will be allocated by the government into grants/welfares for the poor
- The private sectors also could help the poor in the form of private charities.
The government
- The government could help the poor by allocating the tax payment from companies into federal budget, that could be use to provide aids and welfare such as health care, scholarship, public infrastructure, etc
- The government could improve the nation economy by making favorable trade deals with another nations
- Not only that, the government could also give some incentives for local business so they can grow and provide more job opportunities
<h2>Answer:</h2>
<u>The examples of hard power methods in foreign policy are ;</u>
Military intervention
Protectorate alliance
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
Hard power in International relations is related to the use of force and coercion. Military Interventions are terms related to hard politics so it can be considered as a method of hard power in foreign policy. Similarly, a protectorate is a state or country that's protected by a larger, stronger country. So a Protectorate alliance is a group of countries which protects a small and weak country. This can also be considered a method of hard politics while designing a foreign policy.
