Answer and Explanation:
1. he presents arguments that reaffirm that the colonies must separate from Great Britain because all men are equal before God and it is not right that one control the other. In addition, he claimed that the right to freedom, life and the search for one's own happiness without having to be in debt to someone, or needing someone's permission, were inalienable rights, so it was not up to England to withdraw or repress them. them.
2. The declaration of independence cannot be seen as a direct threat of war. This is because the colonies did not have the desire to face a military power like Great Britain. However, the declaration of independence was a complaint pointing directly to dissatisfaction with the British crown and reaffirming that the colonies would be independent at all costs, even if it generated a war.
3. He represents these arguments, showing that governments should be based exclusively on "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority." Thus, he affirmed that governments should be representatives of the people and work for this representation and not for a concentration of power, where the people should act for the government.
Answer: C. Grow the tree in a pot and measure the mass of the soil before and after the tree grows to a certain height
Explanation: When testing an hypothesis, which is a prediction of the outcome of an experiment, it is vital to keep all other factors, that can affect the outcome of the experiment, constant; so that any outcome can be attributed (or disregarded) to the variable being tested.
In this case, the variable being tested is the soil, and so all other factors such as water, air, sunlight, etc. should be kept constant.
Very bad, the Japanese-Americans were tortured with very little food and much other things that made living conditions tuff!
