Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think it's <u><em>C </em></u>
Explanation:
Sorry if I'm wrong!
Answer: In Communism, citizens have the right to own private property.
Explanation: cuz it says so boom
Answer:
The Founding of the Colonies. ...
French and Indian War. ...
Taxes, Laws, and More Taxes. ...
Protests in Boston. ...
Intolerable Acts. ...
Boston Blockade. ...
Growing Unity Among the Colonies. ...
First Continental Congress.
Explanation:
