1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
m_a_m_a [10]
3 years ago
12

How did the slave trade differ in different parts of Africa?

History
1 answer:
marshall27 [118]3 years ago
6 0
Slavery existed in Africa, but it was not the same type of slavery that the Europeans introduced. The European form was called chattel slavery. A chattel slave is a piece of property, with no rights. Slavery within Africa was different. A slave might be enslaved in order to pay off a debt or pay for a crime. Slaves in Africa lost the protection of their family and their place in society through enslavement. But eventually they or their children might become part of their master’s family and become free. This was unlike chattel slavery, in which enslaved Africans were slaves for life, as were their children and grandchildren.
You might be interested in
How did the policy of Fordham affect workers
katovenus [111]

Answer:

Serious consequences affecting your employment status may result when consent is withdrawn and claims are made citing abuse of power and authority, or when there is a disruption of the professional environment.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Hitlers aim with respect to Russia was to destroy its economy and knock Russia out of the war
postnew [5]

Answer:

At a cost of 20 million casualties, Russia won her war. ... The economic benefits it brought Germany were useful, but in the eyes of ... other bombers destroyed hundreds of Soviet aircraft on their airfields. ... Stuka squadrons had been routed out of comfortable billets in France and sent to the Polish plains.

Explanation:

Operation Barbarossa (German: Unternehmen Barbarossa) was the code name for the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union, which started on Sunday, 22 June 1941, during World War II. The operation put into action Nazi Germany's ideological goal of conquering the western Soviet Union so as to repopulate it with Germans. The German Generalplan Ost aimed to use some of the conquered as slave labour for the Axis war effort, to acquire the oil reserves of the Caucasus and the agricultural resources of Soviet territories, and eventually to annihilate the Slavic peoples and create Lebensraum for Germany

7 0
3 years ago
Why is it irrational and unproductive to try to "prove" or "disprove" the<br> existence of God?
NARA [144]

Answer:

It's not worth it.

Explanation:

I'm a believer, but if people are really sure to believe that they were created by the big bang, or by a superior creature they will believe it no matter what evidence you provide. Another example of this is flat-earth believers.

It would just be a waste of time, depending on your audience of course.  

3 0
3 years ago
Explain how, although it wiped-out over 200,000 mostly-innocent people, dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan can be viewed as a GOO
snow_tiger [21]

Well.... The only GOOD thing to come out of the Atomic Bombs dropped on Japan was that it ended the war in the Pacific, and WWII as a whole.

After Germany surrendered on May 7th, 1945, the Japanese were frankly disgusted. They said that Germany should have fought to the last man and last bullet before laying down their arms. To the Japanese, to surrender willing was a cowardly disgrace, and was the reason for many of the kamikaze attacks on U.S. ships. It was also the reason why Japanese pilots carried pistols in their planes because if they were shot down and just so happened to survive, they needed to kill themselves instead of having the humiliation of being captured.

So, Japan made it very clear that unlike Germany, they would fight tooth and nail till the very end. At the time, the U.S. saw the Atomic Bomb as a cheaper alternative to losing men and equipment in a seemingly never-ending battle against the Japanese Empire.

7 0
3 years ago
Answers to "Valley Forge: Would you have quit?"
xeze [42]

I can't really answer this for you because this is YOUR opinion but here's what I would've said; Yes, I would have because of the extreme hardships the militia men had to go through. During that winter, many soldiers had suffered the consequences of going through and not quitting the journey but if I were one of them, I would've quit. Even though I know that I have to fight for the country, I would not have been able to go through with the lasting consequences. Men had to walk through treacherous snow which also was cold and wet, this was not a good environment for soldiers to be in.


3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the primary goal of interest groups?
    5·1 answer
  • Which area was never conquered by the Persians, even at the height of their empire?
    7·2 answers
  • Africa is the Choose... + largest continent in the world.​
    6·2 answers
  • Why are governmental services more expensive in cities compared to other areas?
    12·1 answer
  • Rhode island passes first colonies law making slavery illegal date?!!<br> please helpp
    13·1 answer
  • A place in iceland that became first in GPI back then
    6·1 answer
  • William Penn referred to his colony as a “Holy Experiment” because
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these resulted in land acquisition by the United States? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • All of the following statements about the activities of interest groups are TRUE except:
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the condition of roads in the late 1700s?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!