Answer: The law cannot cause or correct social differences.
Explanation: Examining the passage above from a broader view connotes that racial instinct, thought or perception are borne from social differences between groups or communities such as race, gender, influence or wealth which helps nurture the thought that a social group or class is distinctly and significantly superior or better than others. The law can strike a balance in the civil and political rights pertaining to social groups. However, social differences such as race, gender and so on is not within the control of the law.
Answer:
CONGRESS PARTY ruled over Haryana between 1982 to 1987.
Explanation:
Assertions are strong statements which provide strong fact. Rhetoric theory is one which checks the available persuasions for the statement and the validates the claiming statement.
As given that non formal institutions have no role to play at processing stage of system theory, this statement has no valid supporting evidence.
The validity of this statement is questioned and therefore readers will have no evidence to accept this statement. The readers will think differently and assertion made is not accepted by the readers.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24358664
Cresswell blamed the New Englanders for the growing antagonism.
Answer:
The correct answer is "The fundamental attribution error".
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error is the human tendency to emphasize personal characteristics instead of analyzing the contextual or situational explanation for other people's behavior.
<u>For example, when someone fails a test, the other students may think that their classmate failed because he is lazy or he didn't study enough and not because the questions of the test were wrongly formulated</u>.
In this particular case, the first attribution that one does to the jam is that the couple did it because they are bad communicators, only because they were arguing moments before, <u>rather than attributing the failure to get the frame to through the doorway to the possibility that it might be too big for the doorway.</u>
In conclusion, this is an example of the fundamental attribution error.