The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.
How did the League of Nations respond to genocide prior to 1945?
The League of Nations responded to genocide prior to 1945 in a weak way. The League of Nations failed to politically and militarily challenge this terrible act.
The League of Nations was a forum to resolve disputes among member countries. Through its charter, member nations pledged to act collectively against any country that attacked a member country. However, in reality, it did never had the proper organization and coordination to address important issues such as genocide.
The League of Nations was formed after World War 1 in order to prevent another armed conflict. It was the precursor of the United Nations. United States President Woodrow Wilson was one of the most important supporters of the idea although, in the end, the United States decided no to be part of the League.
Answer:
Explanation:
Let's examine each quote.
“becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them”
- This states that the colonies need to be independent.
“The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations”
- This quote states that the King (George III) had abused his power and impeded on rights.
“it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government”
- This states that the people are allowed to change or get rid of a government.
“and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer”
- History shows people will suffer.
So, the quote that demonstrates King George III has abused the colonist's right is<u> B. “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations”
</u>
Answer:
never say never anything is potentially possible, it just depends on how many reasorces the us deployed into it. If theoreticly they spent eveything they had into the world they would definitvely win the war. (sorry if this doesnt' exactly answer the hw question I had no idea how long to make it sry)
Explanation:
Answer: They were put to work
Explanation: Before industrialism children simply helped their parents with the farms, but once factories started appearing labor was the biggest problem, so children were put to work because they could be under paid and mistreated.
<span>Helped people to have better lifes
</span>
