Answer:
A primary source is anything that gives you direct evidence about the people, events, or phenomena that you are researching. Primary sources will usually be the main objects of your analysis. If you are researching the past, you cannot directly access it yourself, so you need primary sources that were produced at the time by participants or witnesses (e.g. letters, photographs, newspapers).
A secondary source is anything that describes, interprets, evaluates, or analyzes information from primary sources. Common examples include: 1. Books, articles and documentaries that synthesize information on a topic 2. Synopses and descriptions of artistic works 3. Encyclopedias and textbooks that summarize information and ideas 4. Reviews and essays that evaluate or interpret something When you cite a secondary source, it’s usually not to analyze it directly.
Examples of sources that can be primary or secondary:
A secondary source can become a primary source depending on your research question. If the person, context, or technique that produced the source is the main focus of your research, it becomes a primary source.
To determine if something can be used as a primary or secondary source in your research, there are some simple questions you can ask yourself: 1. Does this source come from someone directly involved in the events I’m studying (primary) or from another researcher (secondary)? 2. Am I interested in analyzing the source itself (primary) or only using it for background information (secondary)?
Most research uses both primary and secondary sources. They complement each other to help you build a convincing argument. Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but secondary sources show how your work relates to existing research.
Answer:
Most early cities developed in southern Mesopotamia because it had more fertile land.
Explanation:
A is not correct because Mesopotamia was poor in natural resources, it actually had just two primary ones, but those two were the most important at that time.
B is correct because the abundance of fertile land along the Tigris and Euphrates enabled the developement of societies, as the people were able to produce much more food than they needed and used it for trade to obtain other goods.
C is not correct because civilization was only able to develop because of the abundance of fertile land and water.
D is not correct because the natural borders don't provide conditions for the development of civilization, but just make it easier as they eliminate the threat of invasion.
Shinto and Buddhism are very popular in Japan as well as Christianity and catholicism
Answer:
hi it's sunny day bc the sun is sunny
The poor distribution of services and inadequate infrastructure is basically inadequate and almost unreachable for the poor people in South Africa.
In a lot of areas dominated by poor and marginalized people, electricity is almost inadequate. This is a major infrastructure that should be equitably distributed between all classes in the country.
Health and medical infrastructure are limited. The people have no access to what is available due to the high costs and the unavailability of financial resources. Due to the nature of these people, they should have the best form of medical attention.
There is also a lack of technological skills in the country. This affects the poor and marginalized, especially the subsistence farmers who needs these to improve their farming.
Read more on brainly.com/question/24620735?referrer=searchResults
