Answer:
Explanation:
Background
First of all, you have to know who accused Hughes and of what. Hughes was one of the literary figures of the Harlem Renaissance.
As a poet, he saw his job, I would guess, as a trumpeter pointing out what was wrong with America. In that regard he was a fore runner to Martin Luther King. He (Hughes) did not preach violence. He merely testified before the Senate un-american activities Committee. His poetry came out when he tried to describe himself to lead council. Hughes was asked if he was influenced by the Communist party.
Hughes said yes, but his mind was like a sponge -- it absorbed material from everything he encountered. This was not what lead council was looking for. Like most lawyers, he was looking for a black and white answer and he wasn't getting it.
One of the blackest marks against America was the House of Unamerican activities. It flew in the face of everything the 1st Amendment stood for. So yes, Hughes had a perfect right to speak. He was not like Malcolm X or any of the other violent leaders of Civil Rights. He was a poet seeking answers. When has that become unamerican?
Federalists argue for a separation of powers because B.The president should have more power than the other branches.
<h3>
Further explanation
</h3>
Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?
A. No single branch of government would have too much power.
B.The president should have more power than the other branches.
C.Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.
D.Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.
The Federalists wanted a strong government and also strong executive branch. They also did not want a bill of rights because they thought the new constitution was sufficient.
During the founding of the country, the federalists were ideologically pitted against the anti-federalists. The federalists favored a stronger central (federal) government because of the precursor to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave no strength to the national government. It couldn't tax the states and had to rely on donations from the states for funds. And also there was no central army and many feared the return of the British, which they did in the War of 1812.
Federalists argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances system created in the new Constitution protected the people. No one group could control the other two. They argue that the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about Federalists brainly.com/question/3230108
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: history
Chapter: Federalists
Keywords: Federalists
And also it controlled venetia
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The answer is option C or "the U.S. stock market crash of 1929." The Great Depression begun because of the U.S stock market crash causing the economy to lose millions of investors. On top of that a great drought hit farmers and they weren't able to grow food to sell or buy, also many people try to withdraw money from their savings account and because there was so many people withdrawing money banks ran out of money and had to close down. Finally, because of the decreased international lending and tariffs the Great Depression began and was one of the worse economic downturn events that has ever happened in history.
Hope this helps.