In Walden, Thoureau presents a lesson of wisdom about the best way to life as an individual and as a social being.
What would look like excentricity to most people, means to him a reflection about the capitalism and the advantages and disadvantages of urbanization and industrialization.
The trancendentalism defended the vality of the intuition, and individualism. So it fits with the thoughts of Thoureau about the industrialization and reflections about life, as it is possible to confirm in Walden when a question is frequently asked about what is really important to the basic needs for the modern man to have a good life. He defends that it is possible to have a good life with the minimum of material resources to provide whatever the spirit needs, such as reading, reflections about life and nature watching. On the other hand, he afirms that it is possible to have a good life without an excess of clothes, food or fancy houses.
Answer:
this is a paragraph of i went to Dubai
please mark brainliest
Here we go .. Let us choose the idea friend as a topic .. sounds cool ha?
Well let us go get done with it ..
Everything in this world is either changing by itself or being changed. Even abstract concepts changed though time, history itself was told and retold again sometimes with a completely different story. This "change" idea is most accurate when it gets to our everyday life. Everyday we go out for fun. Everyday we try to solve problems. Everyday and every time we are in a state of continuous search for the "better life" when and wherever we are. What is in common amongst all of our everyday searches? Well, as for humans, the complicated humane animals we are supposed to be, there are plenty and plenty of issues in common. Still, undoubtedly the need for company for us has never even been disputed by any wise philosophical authority. The more chemistry we have the better the reactions, and the better the reactions the better the experiences we go through.
Everyone got special personal preferences that are identical to them like their own fingerprints, let's call it the psycho-mental print or impression of one person. This impression affects not only the way we think or perceive things, events, or sayings, but also the way we get along with others and how we feel towards them. The ideal person for me, for instance, may seem very despicable and unfriendly for another and vice versa. Even the person I may find to be super friendly and we click together may not have the same characteristics like that I may feel in love with. However, I think that there are some basics that must be in one person to be considered an "ideal friend".
We all should not at all lie, but still there are sometimes that we sort of have to or the situation may deteriorate in a very bad way. Yet, an ideal friend must never lie to their friend, I think. The concept of an ideal friend does not mean that they are supposed to be perfect, but again they should be as close to the person we wish to be as possible. One always looks for what we miss in ourselves when we search for a friend.
In addition to honesty, an ideal friend is better be always candid and straight to the point when discussing issues together. If we check a thesaurus for the the word ideal, we will find that his word concludes all the blessings of the world of excellency perfection and so on. Hence, I guess that the ideal friend, though rare to fine, but will last beyond a life time to go further as a friend for the family after one person's death. Those they who will never hate me when I do them wrong and cannot love me anymore when I am so good to them for they already love me best, those are ideal friends.
For every story there is an ending, they say. I am sure that is true except when it comes to true friendships or real love, for among those time does not seem to go as fast as we feel it usually. It rather stops! One minute becomes forever, and one moment becomes the eternity!
Best Luck!
Wise
Answer:
The teeter-totter was shared by the boys.
Explanation:
Passive voice is when the object of the sentence becomes the subject of the sentence. The subject of the sentence then receives the action instead of doing it. Passive voice always includes a form of the verb 'to be' and a particle of the main verb. In the case of the last sentence, the teeter-totter is the object/subject. "Was" is the past tense form of the verb "to be." Shared is the past particle of the verb "share."
So basically, the breakdown is like this:
The teeter-totter + was + shared by + the boys.
object past tense past particle subject
of the verb of the verb
'to be' 'share'
All the other sentences are in active voice as the subject is doing the action. "Lilly took", "Little boy arrived", "The boy started playing" all have the subject in front of the verb.
Hope this helps. :)
