The purpose for holding money in economic in classified into:
- transactional motive
- precautionary motive
- speculative motive
<h3>The Drop-downs includes:</h3>
- When price levels rise, people hold onto cash. - Speculative motive
- When interest rates are low, people forgo interest income - Speculative motive
- When aggregate income is high, people hold cash to buy goods that are plentiful and cheap - Transactional motive.
- When interest rates are low, people speculate that they will soon increase - Speculative motive
- Andy decided to hold his money in cash, as he did not earn sufficient money as income from interest. - Speculative motive
- Ben is a consumer and decides not to purchase luxury items because they are too expensive - Speculative motive
- Chad thinks it to be a good opportunity to buy the products from the market as the supply has increased. - Transactional motive
- Daphne is holding onto her money as she feels that the interest rate will go up soon - Speculative motive
Read more about holding motives
<em>brainly.com/question/16287958</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is the first option: Because of our limited incomes conflicting with our insatiable wants for goods and services.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the microeconomics theory, the individuals agents that are the consumers are all the time trying to satisfy their needs due to the fact that there is an unlimited desire for goods and services that keep continue to grow all the time and that conflicts with the fact that most of the people have only few and limited resources to get the necessary income to obtain all of those goods and services. That is why that the consumers always look for the way to maximize their satisfaction according to the available income that they have with the purpose to spend it on those goods and services.
For economies of scope to occur it must be true that THE COST OF PRODUCING THE TWO GOODS TOGETHER IS LESS THAN THE COST OF PRODUCING THE GOODS SEPARATELY.
The economy of scope is the proportionate savings that is gained by producing two or more different goods together, when the cost of doing so is less than that of producing each separately.
Here are the answers in order: <span>Positive, normative, positive
Positive analysis usually used to find the most efficient way to solve a problem regarding the cost (sometimes it even involve something harsh and unethical)
Normative analysis refers to what should've been done after considering ethical value
</span>
Answer:
True (at least most of the time)
Ideally companies will require their systems analysts to have a college degree in information systems, computer science, business, or a closely related field.
But sometimes the demand for people with a degree in computer science or information systems is much larger than the supply, then many companies go directly to the colleges and hire students who haven't graduated yet.
I know this since a few years ago a local university issued a public statement about this issue since less that 30% of their students (in computer related fields) actually graduated. Most of the students were hired by Intel, IBM and HP during their third college year and they dropped out. Of course the students left because they were offered high salaries, imagine if you are 20 or 21 years old and a huge corporation offers you over $70,000 a year. I'm not sure that this is still happening, but I doubt it has changed.
