Immigration is a constant problem in america. Me personally I don't mind immigrants as long as they're here legally and no, I do not know anyone that was an immigrant.
Answer:
In Ivan Pavlov's famous studies, the food was the unconditioned stimulus, and the salivation was the unconditioned response.
Explanation:
Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936) was a Russian physiologist who conducted studies on behavior conditioning with dogs. In his studies, dogs would learn to associate different stimuli and produce certain responses.
A unconditioned stimulus is something that produces a natural, automatic response. That natural response is called unconditioned response. In Pavlov's studies with the dogs, he would show them food, and the dogs would start salivating because of it. That means the unconditioned stimulus was the food, and the unconditional response was the salivation.
<u>Mechanical solidarity</u> is a shared conscious among society's members who each has a similar form of livelihood. Hence, that is the answer. Read below about Mechanical solidarity.
<h3>What is Mechanical solidarity?</h3>
Mechanical solidarity is the social integration of members of a society who have common values and beliefs. These shared values and beliefs constitute a “collective conscience” that works internally in individual members to cause them to cooperate.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about Mechanical solidarity: brainly.com/question/5131392
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults.
Explanation:
The passage below is from the U.S. Supreme Court decision In re Gault (1967). From the inception of the juvenile court system, wide differences have been tolerated... between the procedural rights accorded to adults and those of juveniles. In practically all jurisdictions, there are rights granted to adults, which are withheld from juveniles.. [H]istory has again demonstrated that unbridled discretion, however benevolently motivated, is frequently a poor substitute for principle and procedure... Which conclusion did the Court draw from this reasoning?
In re Gault was a case where parents believed their child was denied due process. The court ruled that states must reform their procedures of juvenile justice in order words,States must provide minors accused of crimes with most of the same "due process" rights given to adults.
Answer: The person has the right to remain silent and refuse to answer any questions.
Explanation:
The Miranda warning or rights is a statement that the police give to anyone who has been arrested in the United States. This warning has a format that is issued to every person at the time of the arrest.
The Miranda warning is given as follows:
1- You have the right to remain silent
2- Anything you say can be and will be used against you in court
3- You have the right to speak with a lawyer and have a lawyer present during the interrogation
4- If you cannot afford the services of a lawyer, the government assigns you one
5- Are you aware of all the rights that have been mentioned before?
Every person at the time of arrest has rights and they should not be violated. When the person is not aware of this, it can generate evidence against itself, even do the person is innocent. Everyone must know what they should and should not do when they are arrested.
The name of Miranda Warning arises as a result of a case happened to a person named Ernesto Arturo Miranda. This person was found guilty of crimes of kidnapping and armed robbery. These charges were adjudicated due to Ernesto's confession when he was interrogated by the police. This case became the historic the United States Supreme Court case known as the Miranda case against Arizona. From this moment it was dictated that every person at the time of being arrested must know what their rights are.
