The answer is a hope this helps!!!!
It was a result of the cooperation between the public and the private sector. The private sector owners built things like railroads and public roads so they wanted to get money back through tolls and turnpikes. In return, they would pay taxes for money obtained this way and the states enjoyed this money and wasn't bothered by what was happening.
In the late 1940s, the United States responded to the growing threat presented by the Soviet Union by trying to stem the tide of Communism by supporting and propping up governments that opposed Communism.
<span>For Jefferson, the basic elements of the argument for separation lie in a lack of respect. Jefferson frames the argument that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is emphatic in how the British government has refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that could enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop. For Jefferson, the critical argument that makes rebellion and dissolution absolute is that this lack of respect will not depart. As long as this imbalance exists, the Colonists will be treated in a secondary manner, denying them their full voice and activation of their rights. It is in this light where I think Jefferson's key arguments lie. In the second section regarding the "Grievances" that the Colonists have borne, Jefferson outlines all that has been done. In doing so, he solidifies his initial argument that separation from Great Britain is the only path that the Colonists can pursue. The relationship between both nations has been so degraded by a lack of respect that there is no other option.
rephrase this in your own words</span>
Well this was the beginning of women wanting equality, and also inspired the long process in history for African Americans to attempt freedom. It's eventually gained, but even as free people African Americans are not given the same rights as the old white guys who wanted "freedom" back in colonial days.
