Judicial activism is the act of passing ruling in a court not according to the law, but to personal beliefs and preferences. The opposite of judicial activism is judicial restraint, in which the judges follow the constitution exactly and abstain from passing ruling not specified in the constitution.
I can give you my take on it:
In command economies the quantity and more importantly the prize of the products is decided by the government and not by the people in production. As a result, people in the production can't have the motivation of producing more, as they won't benefit from it. So command economy encourages low motivation among the workers (i believe this was the case in the Eastern Block)
The most important question is D. <span>did the employer organization know about the alleged behavior.
Corporations often using their human resources to dismiss the sexual harassment complaints that come from their employees. They did this in order to protect the well-being and reputation of their internal members rather than protecting the victim of the harassment</span>
