I'd have to say that your answer would be, things are not always what they seem.
It is TRUE to state that even in paraphrased work the reader should be able to identify where the paraphrase begins and end.
<h3>What is a paraphrase?</h3>
A paraphrase is a restatement of a text's or passage's meaning using another language. The name itself is taken from the Ancient Greek 'additional mode of expressing' via Latin paraphrasis. Paraphrasing is also known as paraphrasis.
The act of paraphrasing demonstrates that you comprehend the source sufficiently to express it in your own words. It also provides a strong alternative to utilizing direct quotations, which ought to be used sparingly.
The difference between Summary and Paraphrasing is given as follows:
- The main idea of the entire source is briefly and clearly expressed in an abstract form, but the paraphrase repeats the idea of the source in detail.
- Because a paraphrase contains all of the author's main ideas, it is usually as long as the original source, sometimes longer. However, summaries are always shorter.
- Paraphrasing is most useful when you want to present or explore an author's ideas but don't think the original words are worth quoting directly. Paraphrasing is great because it helps you control the temptation to quote too much from the source.
Learn more about paraphrasing:
brainly.com/question/24729251
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Even in paraphrased work the reader should be able to identify where the paraphrase begins and end.
Is the above statement TRUE or FALSE?
Answer:
A. It guides the response of the reader
Explanation:
To recognize the authors purpose, it helps the response of the reader to better understand why they wrote what they did. Hope this helps
