Answer:
The American revolution was inextricably linked with the transformations of the late 18th century, which also took place on the European continent. In time, it almost coincided with the French Revolution, and historically its origin is largely due to the same reasons. Therefore, in the literature these revolutions are often compared. In the question of the origin of the French Revolution, the situational factor is particularly distinguished. The American revolution is interpreted as part of a broad transition period. Both revolutions are interpreted in the context of the theory of clash and change of elites.
First of all, it should be emphasized that the American revolution proceeded under different historical conditions than the French one. While France was a country with a deep historical tradition and centuries-old culture, young America, or rather, the English colonies in America, were relatively recently settled, had not yet had time to acquire traditions and had just begun to create their own culture.
In the American and French revolutions that took place almost at the same time, two essentially opposite concepts prevailed - “checks and balances” and “common will.”.
The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas persistently rethought by the most serious of men in the process of creating a new nation, which was destined to become the freest and most successful community of people in the history of mankind.
The French Revolution was a protest of an angry crowd. It met the desperate resistance of the old classes, and to break it, the merciless dictatorship of the Jacobins was required. The Jacobin dictatorship and the speeches of the plebeian masses were the peak of the revolutionary upsurge in France. The American revolution did not know this kind of phenomenon, and the destruction of the old order did not require such significant efforts.
Explanation:
False come on homie you should know this brodie
Being multinational organisations the IMF, World Bank and WTO can start programs that not only would focus on providing shelter, food and clothing to the poor but also a good and sustainable source on income. By providing a sustainable livelihood to these poor people these organisations would them be able to provide themselves making them able to no longer rely on charity and donations in order to survive their daily lives. By having a sustainable source of income these poor people can have the ability to gain money which then can be used to buy their own food, clothing, shelter and education. The most important thing that money would give to these poor people is education. Through proper education these poor people would increase their knowledge enabling them to be qualified for higher paying jobs.
