Answer:
D
Explanation:
working with laws, rules, and regulations
just got this right on plato
#platogang
The answer is C<span>many computers, in fact, have been exclusively purchased for the sole purpose of sending and receiving email only.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the cash budget for the month of March ended is presented below:
Cash Budget
Particulars Amount ($)
Opening Cash Balance 72,000
Add: Cash Receipts from Sales 300,000
Total Cash Available 372,000
Less:
Cash Payments
Purchases 140,000
Salaries 80,000
Cash Expenses 45,000
Repayment of Bank Loan 20,000
Total Payments -285,000
Closing Cash Balance 87,000
We simply deduct the all payments from the total cash available so that the ending balance of cash could come
Answer:
This is an actual court case where the Supreme Court of Rhode Island ruled in favor of Cox Communications in February, 2014.
The court ruled that Ovalles was an employee for M&M, and that M&M had an independent contractor relationship with Cox Communications. Additionally, Ovalles was also an independent contractor for M&M, not an employee. There existed no direct relationnship between Cox and Ovalles.
Even though Ovalles and other independent contractors use both Cox's and M&M's logos on their vans and uniforms, this was done so consumers could identify them. The fact that an identification is needed so customers can determine the function of a technician, doesn't imply that those technicians are actually employees of the firm nor they actually a method of control over the technicians.
Since Cox didn't control the performance of Ovalles and didn't have contact with him, then there was no reason to consider him an employee of Cox.
The plaintiff, Barbara Cayer probably made a mistake when it included Cox in the lawsuit (since it is a large company), and she would have had a better case against M&M because that company did have control over Ovalles's performance and did have contact with him. But since M&M was a much smaller firm, they decided to go after the big fish. Later they tried to include M&M into the lawsuit but it was rejected since the Supreme Court had not made their ruling yet.
Answer:
Land account = $69,540
Building account = $543,200
Explanation:
<u>land</u>
Cost of land $61,200
Demolition of old building $8,600
Sale of salvaged materials ($2,400)
Legal fees (for title investigation of land) $2,140
total $69,540
<u>building</u>
Architect fees (for new building) $15,300
Building construction costs $509,000
Interest costs related to the construction $18,900
total $543,200
Property taxes on the land (for the first year) $3,110 are not capitalized. Land costs cannot be depreciated, while building costs are.