The agency that is responsible for the roads in Lynchburg, Virginia is the Virginia Department of Transportation. This is a state agency is that is responsible for all of the roads in the state of Virginia. Some of the things that they do is to maintain all roadways, operating the roads, and building the roads. They also make sure to keep the roadways clear of ice in the winter by putting down chemicals and salt to keep the ice melted off the major roadways. They also plow the roads in the winter. In the summer, they start clearing off the sides of roads of grass and debris. The county road crews are normally only filling potholes and other minor issues with roads in the area.
Wrong in absence of gov. there will be no laws to abide so essentially they can do as they please.<span />
<span>Prefer the 6.1 percent tax-exempt investment.
Let's do the math and see why the tax-exempt investment is the better choice. For the 8.1% taxable investment, you get taxed at the rate of 28%. Which means that you only get to keep 100%-28% = 72% of your gains. So 0.72 * 8.1 = 5.832 which means your effective earning percentage is only 5.832% which is less than the 6.1% rate you get for the tax-exempt investment. Another consideration that wasn't taken into account for the question is the earnings on the taxable investment may push you up into a higher tax bracket. Which in turn increases the tax burden on your other investments. So the better choice here is the 6.1% tax-exempt investment even though that first glance the 8.1% investment looks higher.</span>
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Direct materials used in production = $250,000
Direct labor = $185,000
Manufacturing overhead = $245,500
Beginning Work in Process Inventory = $20,000
Ending Work in Process Inventory = $30,000
Cost of finished goods manufactured for the year:
= Direct materials used in production + Direct labor + Manufacturing overhead + Beginning Work in Process Inventory
= $250,000 + $185,000 + $245,500 + $20,000 - $30,000
= $670,500
The crowding-out effect implies that restrictive fiscal policy will reduce real interest rates.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The crowding out effect is the circumstances where greater interest rates consequences gives output of a decline in private investment expenditure so as to dampen the initial rise in overall investment expenditure. Authorities often embraces a restrictive fiscal-policy approach and raises spending to stimulate economic activity. This contributes to interest-rate rises. Higher interest rates have a impact on private investment choices. A high magnitude of the crowding-out impact can also result in lower economic revenue.
