A cultural system creates a unique world that is experienced as "reality" by its members. The people of a certain culture come to accept the "realities" which form its culture.
However, when groups of different cultures come together, their "realities" become confronted. Creating a clash of cultures. The outcome of this clash is decided by the material power of each of this groups. The group with the most material will emerge victoriously and end up influencing the other group with its cultural system. Therefore, individuals from the influenced culture will end up learning a new "reality" by force. On the other hand, individuals of the influencing culture tend to see the others as "objects of study".
Clashes of cultures have been occurring throughout time, affecting the cultural authenticity of groups. Due to the constant blend of cultures, it is nowadays, very difficult to consider that a certain cultural group is "truly authentic".
Answer:
One
Explanation:
The essence of what is a Relative Frequency Distribution is to devide the frequency of an event (in this case "the times that males spend each day thinking about females") by the total number of cases to get the % of how often the event occurs.
In this case, as example:
Say your distribution looks like this:
"the times that males spend each day thinking about females" : 10
"the times that males doesn't spend each day thinking about females": 15
"total" : 25
Relative Frequency Distribution
"the times that males spend each day thinking about females" : 10/25 = 0.4
"the times that males doesn't spend each day thinking about females": 15/25 = 0.6
"total" : 25/25 = 1
0.4 + 0.6 = 1
You can conclude from this that 40% is the times that males spend each day thinking about females
Answer: The correct is option A A red herring
Step by step explanation:
The writer is somehow trying to misleads or distracts readers from a relevant or important question. In this context, It may either be a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion. It is therefore red herring.
Red herring is a kind of fallacy that is an irrelevant topic introduced in an argument to divert the attention of listeners or readers from the original issue. In literature, this fallacy is often used in detective or suspense novels to mislead readers or characters, or to induce them to make false conclusions.
Hello There!
<span>Clinical psychologists have a phd or a psyd, which qualifies them to assess, diagnose, and treat psychological disorders, but they usually do not prescribe medication.
</span>
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
- Hannah ❤
